Sunday Post-Dispatch -
June 4, 2006
When the Government Accountability Office recommended that the government
propose a national plan to deal with electronic waste, the response was hard
for congressional investigators to swallow.
The EPA couldn't draft an e-waste proposal, it said, because computer
manufacturers and retailers couldn't agree on one.
The GAO report was released six months ago, but the EPA continues to offer
only voluntary solutions to problems that result here and abroad from
Americans' old computers.
"In most places, people can just throw them in the trash, and that's a scary
thing," said Barbara Kyle, of Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, a California
nonprofit that tracks electronic-waste problems around the world.
Critics say the EPA's go-slow approach is spawning a patchwork of
conflicting rules around the country.
Meanwhile, landfills take in more computer waste. Local governments get
strapped with recycling and cleanup costs. And countries that lack
environmental rules and protections for workers get most of the computer
waste generated in the United States.
The EPA argues that developing nations provide the markets -- and the
smelters -- for e-waste metals. And the United States, the EPA points out,
is not among the 168 nations that have ratified the 17-year-old Basel
Convention, a global effort to control trade in hazardous waste.
Referring to disclosures about dangerous conditions at foreign facilities,
an EPA official wrote in an e-mail last week that "this is an unfortunate
situation that needs, and is getting, both domestic and international
attention."
Rule coming soon
The EPA says it will address some of those concerns in a rule to be issued
soon concerning handling of cathode-ray tubes from computers. But recycling
advocates contend that up to now, the environmental agency has done almost
nothing to rein in such exports.
"Everywhere you turn, the EPA is putting up obstacles to controls," asserted
Jim Puckett, of the Basel Action Network, a Seattle-based nonprofit that has
documented abuses of foreign workers and children when computers are broken
down.
After Puckett's group discovered Illinois government computers in a Nigerian
dump last fall, Illinois officials hastened efforts to control the flow of
discarded electronics.
"Everybody would prefer a national solution," said Hans Detweiler, deputy
director of energy and recycling in the Illinois Department of Commerce and
Economic Opportunity.
Without a national solution, he added, "you're going to get more and more
states doing their own thing. And having different systems everywhere is not
ideal" -- as when one state bans computers from landfills and a neighboring
state does not.
When people talk about national solutions, they sometimes refer to a
tax-incentive program proposed by Sen. Jim Talent, R-Mo., or a national
recycling fee paid by consumers and modeled after California's program.
But around the world -- across Europe, as well as in Japan, South Korea and
Taiwan -- national programs require manufacturers to collect and take back
computers.
Under a new law in Maine, municipalities direct people to approved
recyclers, who bill computer manufacturers for the costs. The program
coordinator, Carole Cifrino, observed that she lacks the authority to force
out-of-state recyclers to open doors for her inspections.
"If there were a national system to approve recyclers that meet certain
standards, that would help immensely," she said.
'No way of knowing'
The EPA is sponsoring a process involving manufacturers and recyclers that
could lead to such standards, albeit voluntary. But one of the participants,
Lauren Roman, of MaSeR Corp., a Canadian-based recycling company that
operates in the United States, has doubts about its potential.
"The EPA put together this loose group to come up with some best-management
practices and said that whoever wants to adopt them, fine. But well-meaning
people still will have no way of knowing a legitimate recycler from someone
who will just load up their computer and export it," she said.
Thea McManus, an EPA official who works on e-waste issues, said she believes
her agency is making a difference with voluntary programs such as Plug-In To
eCycling, which has helped sponsor the collection of millions of pounds of
electronic discards.
"We sort of think that at the heart and soul of this there needs to be a
national solution. But as to exactly what that means right now, we're in a
learning mode," she said.
McManus trumpeted another EPA program, called the Federal Electronics
Challenge, that encourages federal agencies to properly manage their old
computers.
"If the federal government walks the talk, we are making a difference," she
said.
The program now includes 17 federal agencies that were responsible last year
for donating or recycling almost 1 million pounds of electronics.
But the GAO, among others, characterizes the program as limited for one
reason: Like other EPA e-waste efforts, it is voluntary.
|